The historical sex abuse trial of Jeffrey Donaldson, the former leader of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), has unfolded over four intense weeks at Newry Crown Court.
Facing 18 charges that span from 1985 to 2008, including one count of rape, 13 counts of indecent assault, and four counts of gross indecency, Donaldson has pleaded not guilty.
The allegations involve two female complainants, identified as Complainant A and Complainant B, who claim they were abused as children. Concurrently, his wife, Lady Eleanor Donaldson, faced a “trial of the facts” on five related charges of aiding and abetting, although she was deemed medically unfit for a conventional trial.
Advertisement
Week 1: Case Opening and Complainant A’s Evidence
- Tuesday, 26 May: The jury, consisting of seven men and five women, was sworn in. Donaldson formally entered not guilty pleas to all charges.
- Wednesday, 27 May: Prosecutor Rosemary Walsh KC provided the prosecution’s opening statement, detailing the allegations. Complainant B accused Donaldson of severe sexual abuse and rape before the age of 11, while Complainant A spoke of inappropriate touching.
- Thursday, 28 May: The court viewed pre-recorded police interviews where Complainant A described the abuse as becoming a “very casual thing.” A pivotal moment occurred when the prosecution read a June 2020 letter from Donaldson to Complainant A, where he expressed deep regret for the “hurt and pain” caused, seeking her forgiveness for his “sinful and selfish actions.”
- Friday, 29 May: During the cross-examination, defence barrister Kieran Vaughan KC pressed Complainant A on inconsistencies regarding the nature of the touching, arguing that Donaldson’s letter had no connection to the abuse allegations.
Week 2: Complainant B’s Evidence and the “Brokered” Meeting
- Monday, 1 June: Complainant B detailed an incident where Donaldson allegedly groped her, claiming that Lady Eleanor briefly entered the room but did not intervene.
- Tuesday, 2 June: Complainant B recounted the traumatic experience of being raped as a child. Under cross-examination, she expressed regret for not reporting it sooner, stating, “It was my biggest mistake… I didn’t know the words, I knew it was wrong.” She also described a church-brokered meeting in the mid-1990s where Donaldson allegedly apologised to her.
- Wednesday, 3 June – Friday, 5 June: Supporting witnesses, including Complainant B’s husband and pastors from the Christian centre, testified. Linda Hoy confirmed that Donaldson had explicitly apologised, stating, “I know what this is about and I am truly sorry; please forgive me.” The defence, however, argued that the meeting was focused on spiritual reconciliation rather than addressing specific allegations.
Week 3: Defendant Statements and Donaldson Takes the Stand
- Monday, 8 June: Tapes of Donaldson’s police interview were played, where he labeled the rape allegations as “completely unbelievable,” asserting that no explicit allegations were made during the 1990s meeting.
- Tuesday, 9 June: Eleanor Donaldson’s recorded interviews revealed her claims that women were continually pursuing her husband, and it was disclosed that she had bugged his car out of suspicion.
- Wednesday, 10 June: The prosecution concluded its evidence presentation.
- Thursday, 11 June: Donaldson took the stand, vehemently denying the allegations, stating, “It simply didn’t happen,” while simultaneously admitting to infidelity during his marriage.
- Friday, 12 June: The prosecution cross-examined Donaldson, accusing him of spreading “sinful and deceitful lies” to protect his reputation. He maintained that it was simply “their word against his word.”
Week 4: Closing Arguments and Jury Deliberations
- Monday, 15 June: The defence rested its case, while Eleanor Donaldson’s counsel chose not to present additional evidence.
- Tuesday, 16 June: The prosecution delivered its closing speech, urging the jury not to dismiss the historic allegations, emphasising that Donaldson’s own apologies indicated his guilt.
- Wednesday, 17 June: The defence argued that the complainants were not credible enough for a conviction, with Eleanor’s counsel denouncing the charges against her as “ludicrous.”
- Thursday, 18 June: Judge Paul Ramsey summarised the evidence, instructing the jury to evaluate the reliability of the women’s accounts. The jury began deliberations after three hours of discussion.
- Friday, 19 June: After approximately seven hours of deliberation over two days, the jury was sent home for the weekend, with plans to return refreshed on Monday.
The trial continues Monday (June 22) when the jury returns for further deliberation.
